Early last year I noted India’s proposal to make 2018 the International Year of Millets (IYOM) and its subsequent rolling out of its own National Year of Millets in the same year. Apparently that IYOM proposal, submitted to FAO too late in 2017 to realistically have a chance, has been working its way through the system to where 2023 has been identified as the target year.
In December 2018, the FAO Council decided to support India’s proposal for an IYOM, in 2023. The proposal, in the form of a draft resolution (see Appendix F in the Report of the Council of FAO, 160th Session) was supported by the Africa and Asia regional groups, European Union, Russian Federation, China, Sudan, Kenya, Cuba, Austria, Afghanistan, Thailand, Egypt, Senegal, and Mali.
2018, 2019, 2023
When its initial proposal did not go through, India subsequently (in mid-2018) advocated having the IYOM in 2019. That again might not have left enough time to organize such an observation. Also, the 2019 calendar was already pretty crowded with three international years (on indigenous languages, the periodical table, and moderation).
It is not clear what the process was of deciding on 2023, although that will certainly leave adequate time. The next step is getting a formal United Nations General Assembly resolution declaring IYOM 2023 and its objectives.
Millets (not simply “millet”) are several related grains that have been discussed at some length on this blog (see tag millets, plus an archived version of a post from another site). One question is whether the whole millet spectrum will be covered by IYOM 2023 – from sorghum at the large end to fonio and teff at the small end, via all the grains in between that are surnamed “millet” in English (pearl millet, proso millet, finger millet, foxtail millet, and others).
One thought on “International Year of Millets, 2023”
There appears to be a bureaucratic / organizational lesson in India’s repeated efforts to get an International Year of Millets declared for “next year.” The original proposal was made by ministries of agriculture (federal and Karnataka state), which makes sense in terms of the subject of the proposed Year. However one would expect that the foreign ministry would have the depth on the process side of working with the UN for such a declaration. Was an opportunity missed to consult across ministries, and if it were taken, might the proposal have had a smoother road to success?